The High Court found that Superdrug`s obligation to purchase annual quantities of the product from the manufacturer was clearly accepted. The court found that nothing in Superdrug`s evidence showed that the plaintiff was inappropriate when he considered himself binding on the company on the defendant`s confirmation. The defendant`s failure to draw the applicant`s attention to Superdrug`s policy governing the negotiation of sales contracts was of particular importance for the judgment of the Court of First Instance. It was found that if they had done so, the result would probably have been different. If you are involved in a dispute, all relevant documents can be used as evidence, including emails exchanged between the parties. The applicant claimed that the agreement also escaped an obligation on the defendant to obtain a minimum amount of EUR 1.3 million during that period.